I know this is a blog about technical computer stuff but… What is going on with MTV? I have sat back over the last few years and noticed a disturbing trend. MTV is no longer music television! Why? MTV has given in to what’s popular rather than what they stand for. Now you can get pseudo-real music on MTV2 but why? Why can’t MTV make a station called “MTVC” for MTV-Crap?

If there was an MTV on demand here is what the selections would look like:

1. Whining teenage girls talking about how bad their life sucks and how they want to be popular.

2. Whining teenage girls talking about how much of a “slut” and “whore” members of their cohorts are.

3. Real-world scenarios that they “happened” to catch on tape with no planned scenarios or scenes.

4. Look at how much of a spoiled brat I am on my sixteenth birthday. I’m so rich and you’re not.

5. Find out who’s sleeping with who on “The Hills”.

I absolutely despise “Reality” tv as played on MTV. What has the world come to? When my better half watches MTV at home I promptly switch the channel to TRU TV. At least that shows some real TV. People getting shot, people going to jail and getting DUI’s is far more real than MTV.

Thank you MTV for turning the brains of millions who watch your nonsensical crap into mush. I’d rather slam my head into a brick wall repeatedly because its 100% more real than watching your poor excuse for a television show.

If someone out there could make a device that stabs people who watch MTV in the face over the Internet we would be millionaires. Unfortunately, people will keep watching MTV and we’ll never win.

In the words of Dire Straits: “I want my MTV”

I’ve met and spoke with quite a few persons who believe that RAID is the answer to all of their data-safety needs. There is only one thing I can say about relying solely on RAID: “It’s a horrible idea!”. RAID is a good supplemental protection mechanism in your entire data integrity plan but it is not THE answer.

1. RAID is usually susceptible to double-disk RAID faults. While this may not sound like a normal or even conceivable possibility it is a very real issue that I have personally experienced. RAID-6 offers some higher levels of protection to this problem. Most new 9600 series 3Ware controllers (and most newer controllers) offer RAID-6 capabilities. Choose a RAID-6 able card and, if possible, always run a BBU (Battery Backup Unit).
2. RAID will never protect against file corruption or viruses. 
3. RAID can’t protect against human error. We’re all human, we all make mistakes. If you just hit the delete key on an entire directory of your company’s data then you can probably hit the delete key on your job as well. This is why backups, along with RAID, is the best data integrity solution.
4. RAID will only protect you if you are proactive. Some lower quality RAID controllers do not send email alerts and do not properly alert you of an issue. These controllers require special attention. The more user interaction is needed the less likely you will notice a fault. Having a hot spare or spare disks available for swapping is always a good idea.
5. RAID will not facilitate off-site and disaster recovery scenarios. There are some utilities out there that provide block-level replication.

In summary, the best data integrity plan is to use RAID to supplement your plan. Don’t rely on RAID as your sole backup/data security mechanism. I personally recommend using RAID-6 with a block-level backup of all data to an off-site location. Using software like R1Soft’s CDP will allow for full block-level backups and file-level and bare-metal restores. Remember to always double check your data integrity plan and never be satisfied with your solution! I personally hate loosing data. With drives as cheap as they are today, why aren’t you backing up offsite?

Ever wondered what was going on with a server or desktop that just wasn’t performing “right”? Sure the load average is a good representation of the overall load as described here, but, how do you track down the actual source of the issue? Try out these five utilities to help you track down any load-related issues with your Linux-based installation.

1. top

   
   

   Yes, that’s right, good ol’ fashioned “top”. If you haven’t already used the top command then you may not have been using Linux that much. Top provides a real-time look at processor time, processes that are using high amounts of memory/CPU and also an overview of physical and swap memory.  A preview of top can be seen to the right. Press “1” to show all CPU’s available (if running multiple-core processors or HT-enabled processors).

2. htop
   

   There are also other top variants out there which can provide more information in the same “top-like” format. Enter htop. Htop has been around for quite some time and has, as far as I know, gone generally unknown around the Linux world. htop provides colorful (who doesn’t like colors?) views of the system state and shows tree views for processes that provide even more detail. A screenshot of the htop interface can be seen on the right. Obtain more information about htop here.

3. iostat
   

   Got disk performance issues? Find out with iostat! iostat is used for monitoring speed, ops/sec and cpu time spent waiting on input/output devices to respond. This command is quite useful when attempting to see what is causing your load averages to spike. If your system has high i/o wait times you may consider purchasing faster disks or tuning the performance of your application to be less disk-intensive. Performance tuning, for instance, of a MySQL database can greatly decrease the amount of disk i/o needed. Adding indexes and re-constructing queries can speed up MySQL systems that have high i/o wait times. Of course, you can always throw hardware at the issue as well. For more information on iostat see this article.

4. vmstat
    

   Direct from the vmstat man page: “vmstat reports information about processes, memory, paging, block IO, traps, and cpu activity.” The data shown in vmstat is the average since last reboot.
    
   Direct from man page:

   Procs
          r: The number of processes waiting for run time.
          b: The number of processes in uninterruptible sleep.

   Memory
          swpd: the amount of virtual memory used.
          free: the amount of idle memory.
          buff: the amount of memory used as buffers.
          cache: the amount of memory used as cache.
          inact: the amount of inactive memory. (-a option)
          active: the amount of active memory. (-a option)

   Swap
          si: Amount of memory swapped in from disk (/s).
          so: Amount of memory swapped to disk (/s).

   IO
          bi: Blocks received from a block device (blocks/s).
          bo: Blocks sent to a block device (blocks/s).

   System
          in: The number of interrupts per second, including the clock.
          cs: The number of context switches per second.

   CPU
          These are percentages of total CPU time.
          us: Time spent running non-kernel code. (user time, including nice time)
          sy: Time spent running kernel code. (system time)
          id: Time spent idle. Prior to Linux 2.5.41, this includes IO-wait time.
          wa: Time spent waiting for IO. Prior to Linux 2.5.41, shown as zero.

5. ps

   Although the ps “process list” command does not show real-time updates it can provide useful information as to why your system may be slow. I typically use the “aux” options that shows enough detail but also adding “ww” to the end of “aux” yeilds good results for long commands. Run “ps aux” and look for multiple processes. This is good for troubleshooting if a process like Apache or Exim have spawned many children and caused the system to slow. Use the “e” flag to show children in a tree format.

    

"A new server for mid-size companies, the Power 560 Express, is due on Nov. 21. It uses a 3.6Ghz Power6 processor, comes in four-, eight- and 16-node configurations, and packs a hefty 384GB of memory. It’s designed for companies looking to run multiple applications on a virtualized system. It will be offered with Linux, AIX or i."

IBM brings a new line of processors and machines to the market with unreal memory capacities.

Apparently one of Facebook’s founders, Dustin Moskovitz, is proverbially “jumping ship” to start his own Internet company. This quite possibly the best move for him. I’ve known many people who specialize in starting large companies and keep moving. I believe this is the true way to make money when it comes to entrepreneurial endeavors.

Read More

Linux Trovalds is the father of Linux. He has been very active in the development of the Linux kernel and recently decided to start a blog. Read his blog here.

It will be interesting if he keeps the blog updated or if he posts a lot at the beginning then tapers off.

So, having avoided the whole blogging thing so far, yesterday Alan DeClerck sent a pointer to his family blog with pictures of the kids friends, and I decided that maybe it’s actually worth having a place for our family too that we can do the same on.
Of course, I’ll need to see what Tove wants to do, but in the meantime, here’s a trial blog.

I just received a letter notifying me that tapes containing data with my information on it were "lost" by BNY Mellon’s archive services vendor. I figured I would make mention of this because it is somewhat technical.  I would assume that they are using some sort of encryption routine to protect the data on the tapes. Chances are that these tapes were lost or misfiled. Who knows. The data is most likely unrecoverable but it just goes to show… Even the big boys make mistakes. They do, however, graciously offer 90 days of service from a credit monitoring company. Thanks BNY Mellon!

Here is something odd I found with Google Chrome.

Open Chrome

Go to “google.com”

Middle click maps at the top and see the distorted map on the new tab.

What causes this? Google how well did you review your code. I know it’s a beta … but I expect better from Google It works fine when visiting the maps site directly or refreshing.

Video

It’s very interesting to see what the web was like then and now. Big sites like FaceBook.com and others have been owned by other companies and have looked very different.

Check out a list of the top five web sites on the Internet (as rated by Alexa.)

1. Yahoo

Yahoo went through many changes throughout the years.

October 17, 1996

Feb 10, 1998

Jan 22, 2003

2. Google

Google didn’t really change too much throughout its life thus far. This may be a reason people love Google so much, beside the obvious reasons of course.

Nov 11, 1998 Strange! The first link was to “google.stanford.edu” and the second to “alpha.google.com”.

Dec 02, 1998

Jan 01, 2001 Only 1.3 Billion Pages? Wow

3. YouTube

YouTube has definitely stood the test of time. I wish I would have created a site as popular as this!

May 16, 2005

June 30, 2005

Nov 25, 2005   Nothing too special here. Just them touting about how big a 4GB IPod is!

4. Windows Live (Live.com)

It looks like live.com wasn’t always owned by Microsoft. Check these out!

Feb 11, 1998

Jan 02, 2006

Jan 21, 2007

5. Facebook

It looks like the domain “Facebook.com” was originally owned by a company who created “software to manage your world” in 2003. Facebook was originally called “TheFaceBook” back in the day.

Jun 28, 2003

Aug 12, 2005

Oct 31, 2005 Facebook changes in to the site we all know and love.

Images provided by WayBackMachine.

What is a Semaphore? An article I found here is very useful. It says that “Semaphores can be thought of as simple counters that indicate the status of a resource. This counter is a protected variable and cannot be accessed by the user directly.”

This recently came up when the Dell OpenManage storage service would not start on a Linux system. It complained that there were no more Linux semaphores available. Check out the article for more information.